In a victory for insurers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently rejected an insured’s discovery request for reserve information in a first-party bad faith action. In its April 29, 2014 decision in Mirarchi v. Seneca Speciality Insurance Company, — Fed.Appx. —, 2014 WL 1673748 (3d Cir., April 29, 2014), the Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s denial of the policyholder’s request for the reserves and, in doing so, endorsed the numerous district court decisions that have previously held such information to be non-discoverable.
Late last month, a unanimous Third Circuit panel upheld the trial court’s decisions on appeal. In affirming the ruling that the insurer did not have to produce reserve information during discovery, the Court of Appeals agreed with the district court that “a loss reserve is the insurer’s own estimate of the amount which the insurer could be required to pay on a given claim,” and “[does] not represent an evaluation of coverage based upon a thorough factual and legal consideration[.]” (emphasis in original) Judge Thomas L. Ambro’s opinion also agreed with the district court that loss reserve figures are generally irrelevant and not discoverable. Id.
Although not reported, the Mirarchi decision is important for insurers because it provides support for the position that discovery demands for reserve information are improper even in instances in which the insured has pled a cause of action for bad faith. Under Mirarchi, such information is proprietary and thereby irrelevant and non-discoverable.